CAD people

  • The team at IDEAL Scanners
  • Richard Doyle
    Richard Doyle, noisy advocate of the SolidWorks User Groups, gathers them all together at his blog.
  • Chris Kelley
  • Steve Thomas
  • Ralph Grabowski
    The catalyst of many a CAD discussion, Ralph helps the industry drum beat stay regular
  • Martyn Day
    funny, rude, and utterly english, Martyn often speaks to a wider audience than simply european CAD users
  • Evan Yares
    Often mentioned as a "Dean" of the CAD industry, Evan is ballsy and always great for a good, old fashioned, heated discussion
  • Roopinder Tara
    CAD, CAM and CAE editor
  • Rick Stavanja
    go here for every piece of news about the CAD industry you could ever want
  • Randall Newton
    Randall is an AEC and MCAD industry luminary with surprising insights into the industry
Blog powered by TypePad

AECnews.com

The CAD Industry

CADwire.net - All CAD industry news

American Life. My take on the US

Rhino News, etc.

« Digital Magazines: That's a Fine mess you Got me Into now, Stanley | Main | Word pondering - Thrive »

June 08, 2006

Digital Magazines: follow up

An ndustry participant who asked to remain anonymous, sent me the text below in response to Digital Magazines: That's a fine you got me into now, Stanley.

"Publishers are indeed looking at digital editions as a way to save money on hard-copy production costs. Some b2b publishers are using it to keep old names -- i.e., those who have not responded to renewals after 2 and 3 years. Some as well use digital editions to expand readership with more far from qualified subscribers. Most are involved because they feel they have to be just in case a technology breakthrough makes digital editions a be-all/end-all.

Vendors are only marginally a factor. Publishers can track click-thrus from digital edition ads. That's one of the few areas where they can exhibit true responses. Vendors, however, do not know what they want, even if they thunder as if they do. Further, most are clueless at dealing with the leads publishers deliver them anyway.

Personally, I think every digital edition sucks ... even the so-called cool page-turning ones. It's like DVDs ... I enjoy movies at home, but I love going out to the movies. The cinema's form-factor, so to speak, is a big part of the experience. A DVD and the greatest home theater ever can never replicate that eperience. Thus, I own few DVDs, prefering to borrow one for the night from my local library or rent one from a video store.

Similarly, I have a relationship with a book, a newspaper, a magazine that I will never have with a digital edition of something, even my favorite newspapers and magazines. Digital editions are lifeless entities, like the pod-people in the "Invasion of the Body Snatchers."

Publishers need to get off of the digital edition fad and concentrate on making their hard copy worthy of your subscription. They need to invest in their other digital products -- web, enewsletters, etc. That latter investment needs to be divorced from everything they ever learned in hard copy. Digital and hard copy are two different media. As long as they keep thinking "digital version," they are not thinking of what's best for their hard copy or digital products. They are trying to mate frogs and princes. That only works in fairy tales."

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/5053714

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Digital Magazines: follow up:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In