CAD people

  • The team at IDEAL Scanners
  • Richard Doyle
    Richard Doyle, noisy advocate of the SolidWorks User Groups, gathers them all together at his blog.
  • Chris Kelley
  • Steve Thomas
  • Ralph Grabowski
    The catalyst of many a CAD discussion, Ralph helps the industry drum beat stay regular
  • Martyn Day
    funny, rude, and utterly english, Martyn often speaks to a wider audience than simply european CAD users
  • Evan Yares
    Often mentioned as a "Dean" of the CAD industry, Evan is ballsy and always great for a good, old fashioned, heated discussion
  • Roopinder Tara
    CAD, CAM and CAE editor
  • Rick Stavanja
    go here for every piece of news about the CAD industry you could ever want
  • Randall Newton
    Randall is an AEC and MCAD industry luminary with surprising insights into the industry
Blog powered by TypePad

AECnews.com

The CAD Industry

CADwire.net - All CAD industry news

American Life. My take on the US

Rhino News, etc.

« February 2008 | Main | May 2008 »

March 2008

March 18, 2008

Ken Feitz Takes Position at TransMagic

Ken Feitz, an industry long-timer who has served at companies such as Intergraph, Spatial and (of course) Strategic Reach, this week took a new position at TransMagic, a CAD interoperability company.


TransMagic was founded in 2001 by Todd Reade, and has made a name for itself by selling affordable CAD interoperability tools. Reade's prior background at Spatial Corporation allowed him to be able to leverage the Spatial interop technologies into some pretty neat products.

According to Ken, his first job is to work on the web site (hooray!) and to move TransMagic into a more prominent role in the industry reflective of its industry success. Admittedly, as a company that now has about 20 employees, in a market sector that is definitely challenging, TransMagic has seemed to be a well-kept industry secret. We applaud the move and wish Ken all the best at his new position.

r

March 05, 2008

Print articles Develop 'Gestation times'

Yesterday we got offered an editorial opportunity for an 'industry trend' article. However, the scheduled date was for the Nov/Dec 2008 issue of the magazine. Yes. 8 months away from now.

The reaction of my team was 'maybe we should go for it' (we are). My reaction was more related to gut instinct: The CAD industry, while dry, is still fast-moving on the technology side. A perceived trend now will either be a wisp of an idea in 8 months time, or an established industry fact. ergo: not a trend.

Okay, so we are used to a couple of print publications that stretch their editorial schedule out by 5-6 months. Most print publications are 1-2 months out. But 8 months??? That is beyond ridiculous especially when compared to the usual 1-2 weeks' lead time for online publications.

I am commenting on this because it pushed me over the edge. Inbetween the 8 months gestation time for this article, we can virtually guarantee at least 8 other placements of the same (similar) article in more progressive publications.

And then publishers complain (every now and then) that print subscription is dropping and they are having to tackle online challenges. Well duh. My patience is low this week and things like this simply drive me to zen-like forms of relaxation for a break. With that in mind, I'm off to meditate for a few minutes...

rach